













 | |
|
Robert D.
Gustafson, Attorney At Law
COLORADO SPRINGS TRIAL LAWYER
|
6538 Charter
Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80918-1335
Phone (719) 260-1002
Toll Free (800) 410-1002
E-MAIL
ATTORNEY
|
Attorney
Business Hours
Attorney
Availability Status
FREE
INITIAL CONSULTATION
Driving Directions & Cams
* Maps
Fax (719) 260-1003
|
SUPPORT
ENFORCEMENT
CHILD SUPPORT
& SPOUSAL MAINTENANCE
COLORADO SPRINGS FAMILY LAW ATTORNEY
|
PRIVATE
ATTORNEY
NOT
A GOVERNMENT CSE |
I welcome legal representation inquiries,
but please do not call thinking this is a
government
child support enforcement unit.
|
|
child support enforcement Colorado Springs,
child support, child support enforcement, spousal maintenance, alimony
enforcement, alimony, non-support, non-payment, abandonment, skip tracing, skip
trace, parent locator, enforce, enforcement, judgment, income assignment, wage
assignment, health insurance assignment, health insurance, health expenses,
medical expenses, dental expenses, orthodontia, garnishment, levy & execution,
liens, interstate support, foreign decree, contempt, contempt of court,
arrearage, support arrearage, support arrears, child support arrears, child
support arrearage, spousal support arrears, spousal support arrearage, spousal
maintenance arrears, spousal maintenance arrearage, past due support, past due,
back support, interest, statutory interest, tax exemption, income tax exemption,
registry, family support registry, registry fund, child support order, spousal
maintenance order, alimony order, support order, property and debt enforcement,
commissioner to convey, divorce, dissolution of marriage, legal separation,
invalidity, annulment, paternity, Colorado Springs, Colorado, El Paso County,
courts, court, lawyer, attorney

1. DEFINITIONS
Obligor is the person ordered to pay
Obligee is entitled to receive support
Obligor is ordered to pay support
Courts use these terms because support may be ordered paid by either petitioner
or respondent (plaintiff or defendant in some states), or by husband or wife.
Obligor and obligee simply designate who should pay and who should receive.
2. TYPES OF SUPPORT.
Child support - child may be unemancipated, or may be
emancipated. Emancipation does not cancel the debt, however does limit the
enforcement remedies. Contempt is not available if the child is emancipated.
For purpose of child support obligations, emancipation under
Colorado law is presently the child’s 19th birthday, death, marriage, or
enlistment in the U.S. military armed forces. A child may otherwise become
earlier emancipated, and emancipation may not in fact occur at age 19 - such as
a child with disabilities.
Spousal maintenance, formerly known as alimony - support for an ex-spouse.
Child support combined with spousal maintenance.
Attorney's fees and costs previously awarded. Award may have been designated as
support, or as property settlement which would reduce the remedies available.
Maintenance does not exist in Colorado unless the parties were married
by
common law marriage
or statutory marriage (judge or clergy ceremony). In the event of
marriage, support is termed spousal maintenance. "Palimony" or
maintenance support between non married cohabitating partners is therefore
unavailable absent a dissolution of marriage action. If the parties cohabitated, there is a
legal theory for partner support based in contract law. The landmark case is Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal.3d 660 (1976).
While the actor Lee Marvin's case has been cited in two Colorado cases - Salzman
v. Bachbrach, 996 P.2d 1263, 1267-1268 (Colo. 2000) (see property above) and
In
re Estate of Lewis, 652 P.2d 1106, 1108 (Colo. App. 1982), "palimony"
has not been adopted in Colorado to this attorney's knowledge.
3. STATUTORY INTEREST.
Colorado law - an obligee is entitled to statutory interest at
the following rates:
|
Child Support |
12.0% per annum CRS
14-14-106 |
|
Spousal Maintenance |
8.0% per annum
CRS
5-12-101 |
|
Property awards |
8.0% per annum
CRS
5-12-101 |
|
Fees and costs awards |
8.0% per annum
CRS
5-12-101 |
When computing arrearages, this office uses a
computer
program which computes interest on
irregular debt transactions. Statutory interest will be actively sought.
4. LEGAL
PARENTAGE
If the child(ren) was / were born
out of wedlock and a court order has not entered declaring legal parentage, a
paternity order must be obtained before one parent may seek support from the
other. Please refer to my primary website
Paternity
page for more detailed information.Common Law
Marriage
5. BASIC CONCEPTS
-
Children are entitled to and need support of both parents
-
Regarding spousal maintenance - to obtain an order, an income capability
disparity and need existed
-
Regardless of need, a support order is an obligation - an enforceable
debt
If funds are not immediately available to obligor, perhaps it is
time he / she seeks a loan to pay the support arrears
-
Nature of support enforcement
Support enforcement has a two fold purpose.
To stabilize receipt of current support in a timely fashion
To recover the arrearages - delinquent and unpaid support
Enforcement is a business transaction.
I will not participate in a vendetta or seek remedies more harsh
than that required to collect support. The tools available for support collection are more powerful than
that of the average creditor - banks or charge card companies Those tools necessary to accomplish collection will be utilized,
no more and no less. With client’s authority and financial commitment, all legal
remedies as may be necessary will be utilized to accomplish
support collection
Obligees are entitled to statutory interest from the date each
installment was due
Obligor will be held accountable.
Neither child support nor spousal maintenance are dischargeable in
bankruptcy. Neither sympathy or empathy are relevant regarding obligor’s
current financial position, and manipulation by obligor will not be successful.
Procedures exist for skip tracing and
interstate collection of
support. Support will be enforced unless there is extraordinary justification
for non-payment
Obligor's Income.
Income is subject to assignment for payment of current support
Income is subject to garnishment for support arrears
Employment health benefits are subject to assignment
Termination of employment by an obligor to avoid support payment
is evidence of contempt
"Job jumping" is evidence of support avoidance and
contempt
Property
Bank accounts are subject to garnishment
Non-exempt property is subject to seizure and public sale
Other remedies
If warranted, request can be made of the local governmental
Child
Support Enforcement Unit (CSE) for proceedings regarding suspension of obligor’s driver's,
professional or recreational license as may be relevant.
If warranted, contempt of court can be sought - jail and or fine
penalties
I have raised my daughter alone since infancy. I've paid all the
expenses associated with raising a child - the doctor bills, daycare, food,
shelter, shoes, clothing, school supplies, activity fees & materials, etc.
I understand the cost of raising a child and enforce support arrears - child
support or spousal maintenance (fka alimony). .
I also defend against support claims or enforcement if the obligee is making
an unjust or unlawful claim for child support or spousal maintenance. I
will litigate meritorious defenses with current child support guideline
computations, arrearage computations, and on-line
legal
research is available to retrieve relevant caselaw. I will not,
however, make a frivolous defense for delay purposes.
It is irrelevant which gender will be my client and which will be the opposing
party.
|
6. What do I do if I can't find the other parent?
|
|
attorney has
skip tracing
capabilities in litigation cases or a
private
investigator may be required
|
|
A client may save expense by verification of the birth parent's current contact
information before referring the matter to the attorney for support enforcement
proceedings.
If self help fails - attorney accessible search databases are available;
refer to above skip tracing link. Government
child
support enforcement units establish paternity, enforce support & have access to
governmental tax databases such as worker's compensation to which employers
report quarterly or annually. Private counsel and private persons can not
access tax databases. If a
CSE
has worked a support enforcement case, contact the
CSE
for a potential address before retaining private counsel or ordering a
commercial (pay) search. Feel free to
bookmark this page in case the
CSE
option doesn't work out. |
7. ELECTRONIC
FILING -
e-Filing
availability and court mandatory requirements

|
AVAILABLE
ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS |
1. REGISTRY
FUND
-
Bookkeeping. To enforce support,
obligee must first establish that arrearages
exist, and the exact amount of arrearages. Unless proper bookkeeping exists,
that may be difficult.
-
Registry fund
I Child support alone or child support combined with spousal maintenance may be
ordered paid by the obligor through the statewide
Family
Support Registry Fund in Denver.
II Spousal maintenance may be ordered paid through
the Registry Fund maintained by the local Clerk of Court.
III Both registries merely act as a central repository - neither will initiate
an enforcement action.
-
Detriments and benefits.
I Detriment. Payment into the registry fund will delay receipt of payment by
approximately 10 - 20 days, however after the first delay, payments would be
received monthly if regularly paid.
II Benefit. A reliable accounting is available at
all times. To retrieve an accounting, the cost is $0.75 per page plus $10.00 to
certify. The Court will take judicial notice of the registry fund accounting.
That shifts the proof burden to obligor to show he / she paid more than reflected in
the accounting, and that such contributions were in fact for child support.
III If not previously ordered, registry fund payment is an important tool for
future enforcement and timely receipt of support.
-
Mechanics.
I The
FSR
cashes the obligor's check and sends obligee a warrant drawn on the State of Colorado. Upon receipt,
obligee knows
the check will clear.
II The Clerk of Court merely records the payment and forwards the obligor's
check to the obligee. The check received will clear if Obligor has sufficient
proceeds on deposit.
2. INCOME ASSIGNMENT. Because
support is ongoing, each enforcement action is behind the curve unless
provision is made for timely receipt of current support. An income assignment to be served upon the
obligor's employer requiring withholding
of current support from obligor's income. Upon request, income assignment must
be automatically granted pursuant to statute. CRS 14-14-111.5(2)(f). Assignment
is standard procedure if obligor is presently employed. Arrearages may also be
collected at the rate of 1/24th of the total - payout in 24 months.
Courts will order arrearage amortization to include statutory interest. Maximum
amount which may be taken is set forth in ¶ 4 below - support income
garnishment limitations.
3. HEALTH INSURANCE ASSIGNMENT. Like
support, health care is of an ongoing nature. The enforcement action may be
behind the curve unless provision is made for timely payment of health care
insurance premiums. If obligor was ordered to provide health care insurance, an assignment
may be served upon the obligor's employer
requiring premiums to be withheld and forwarded to the health insurance
provider.
4. JUDGMENT ENFORCEMENT. Arrearages can be
reduced to judgment.
a. Income garnishment. A writ of
garnishment for support may issue against non-exempt net income of the
obligor. When served upon obligor's employer, non-exempt income must be withheld and paid
to the court for subsequent disbursement to obligee. Support income garnishment limitations:
| |
MARRIED |
UNMARRIED |
| PERIOD OF
DELINQUENCY |
PERCENTAGE OF
NET EARNINGS |
PERCENTAGE OF
NET EARNINGS |
| Less than 12 weeks
delinquent |
50% |
60% |
| More than 12 weeks
delinquent |
55% |
65% |
Support garnishments have priority
over and take a larger share of the garnishee's income than garnishments for
non-support. Non-support garnishment limitations: approx 25% of disposable earnings.
It is clear that a support obligee has significantly more leverage than the
average creditor.
b. Bank account garnishments. A writ
o garnishment served upon a bank, FCU, S&L or other financial institution
can be effective. Whatever assets the obligor may have on deposit are frozen
upon service of the garnishment writ, and unless exempt, obligee will receive.
It is important that a client provide whatever information he / she may have regarding obligor’s
assets. If client has a copy of a former support or other check, that would reveal
obligor’s bank. Discovery proceedings may tip off obligor that bank
garnishment is imminent and he / she may move the assets on deposit or convert
to cash and try to hide.
c. Asset levy. After judgment entry,
obligee may obtain a writ of execution and levy against obligor's non-exempt
property to be sold by the sheriff on the steps of the sheriff's office. This is
not generally the best means to satisfy the judgment, but can be effective.
5. CLERK OF COURT AS COMMISSIONER TO CONVEY.
If, in violation of a court order, obligor has failed or refused to transfer title to an asset, the most effective means to complete the transaction is to move for an
order appointing the clerk of court as commissioner to convey. Once the muniment
of title has been signed by the clerk of court or his / her deputy clerk, the
title transfer can be completed with a certified copy of the order. The court
may also award attorney's fees and costs of enforcement.
6. REQUEST
FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ADVERSE ACTION
Request
can be made of the local governmental
Child
Support Enforcement Unit (CSE) which may include:
a. Suspension of Colorado driving privileges, CRS 26-13-123
b. Suspension, revocation, denial or termination of any professional,
occupational, or recreational license, which "license" may include,
but is not necessarily limited to, any license, certificate, certification,
letter of authorization, or registration issued for an individual to practice a
profession or occupation or for an individual to participate in any recreational
activity. This includes adverse action against a professional license and
against any hunting, fishing, boats or parks licenses. CRS 26-13-126
c. IRS + Colorado DOR tax refund intercepts, CRS 26-13-111
d. State vendor payment intercepts, CRS 26-13-111.5
e. Lottery winnings intercepts, CRS 26-13-118
Although the above remedies
resonate power, this attorney has not found requests
for assistance from the local CSE to be highly productive. It doesn't hurt
to ask, but if it is a
non-welfare case I don't anticipate assistance.
7. CONTEMPT
OF COURT
a. Evidence. Income from employment or other sources, or assets sufficient to
satisfy the support obligation establishes ability to comply. IRS or Colorado DOR income
tax records, employer payroll benefit records, bank statements, DMV records,
county clerk & recorder, assessor or treasurer records, or other records may
be placed under subpoena and produced in court to verify financial ability to
comply with the support order and contempt.
b. Preliminary Proceedings. Since incarceration (jail) is an option,
in accord with Constitutional protections, the Court will advise the obligor of
his / her rights. Additionally, the Court may require
mediation
through
the
Office of Alternate
Dispute Resolution - ADR - Mediation prior to final
orders hearing. Refer to the
mediation
link for additional information.
c. Criminal contempt. Obligee has the
burden to establish that obligor had the ability to comply with the court order (pay
support), and willfully failed or refused. Upon a finding of criminal contempt,
to vindicate the dignity of the Court, the judge may sentence the obligor to a
term certain not to exceed 6 months county jail and / or $500 fine.
d. Civil contempt. Obligee has the
burden to establish obligor has the current ability to comply with the court order (pay
support). Upon a finding of civil contempt, the judge may sentence the obligor
to an indefinite term until the obligor complies with the order. This is known
as "he who holds the keys to the jailhouse door."
e. Whichever contempt is pursued,
potential for jail is frequently strong motivation for an obligor to find the
money to pay support. An obligee's goal is to bring support arrearages
into the bank account, not jail the obligor in retribution. I consider
contempt to the remedy of last resort, but effective. After objective
review of alternatives, if contempt proceedings appear to be the best remedy, I
advise clients a contempt order should be pursued aggressively.
|
8. OVERVIEW.
The goal of a support enforcement proceeding is to reduce the paper debt
to spendable or bankable money. If income or bank accounts can be
garnished, this is generally the most effective way to enforce the support
debt. Contempt is the strongest medicine in the cabinet. This
attorney has no aversion to filing a contempt action when warranted, but
prefers to resort to contempt where other procedures are unlikely to
produce results. That is why clients are given a rather lengthy fact
packet if retained - counsel will review options for appropriate remedies.
If the obligor resides in the State
of Colorado (any county) and the support order was entered by the district or
juvenile court in any county in Colorado, the above proceedings are available.
See below for interstate support enforcement.
|
 |
*
* *
* *
* *
*
|
NON-SUPPORT
INVOLUNTARY
TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS
|
If eligible, an obligee may wish to
consider not enforcing child support, but involuntary termination of the obligor
birth parent's rights and step parent adoption. Adoption should be
considered only for the right reasons - to build a nuclear family. Refer
to
Step
Parent Adoption - Non-Support

|
MANDATORY
DISCOVERY
CASE MANAGEMENT BY THE COURT
C.R.Civ.P.
16.2
Adobe Reader version 5 or above
required  |
|
| |
|
Effective
January 1, 2005 Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure C.R.Civ.P. 16.2 was adopted
which provides for mandatory disclosure (discovery), limited motion practice and
case management by the court. Judges and magistrates are serious about
Rule 16.2 obligations and judicial case management. Once the case is
filed, be prepared to disclose documentation and move the case forward in a
timely fashion. Refer to the above link to view the rule - it applies to
the initial case and post decree matters.
To assist in rapid case preparation,
fact
sheets have been made available on-line. Open file password is
given to a client or sent via email once retained. Counsel asks clients to
invest significant effort at commencement of representation to provide an
understanding of the relevant facts and documents which must be disclosed.
Judicial case management has removed any dilly dallying - timely case
preparation is now obligatory to avoid sanctions. |
| |
|
|

If government assistance (welfare) was received during the period of support,
and if the obligee signed an assignment of benefits (standard requirement), the
government will be entitled to support collected before the obligee's
entitlement. Notice of support enforcement proceedings must be given to the local governmental
Child
Support Enforcement Unit (CSE) to avoid welfare fraud criminal charges.

|
INTERSTATE SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT |
|
| |
| INCOMING
CASE |
|
OUT OF STATE SUPPORT ORDER
COLORADO
OBLIGOR RESIDENCE |
|
|
|
| |
|
1. REGISTRATION
OF FOREIGN DECREE
Pursuant to CRS 14-11-101, a decree of dissolution of marriage entered in
another state can be registered in Colorado if the obligor is a resident here.
In such circumstances, the Colorado court takes jurisdiction as though the
initial order was entered here. An exemplified, not certified copy, of all
documents in the originating court file must be filed here with the
registration. Most states have similar statutory provisions under full faith and
credit provisions of the U.S. Constitution.
This
can be a rapid means to obtain jurisdiction over the obligor and utilize
judgment or contempt remedies. The downside to foreign decree registration is
that the responding jurisdiction courts then also have jurisdiction (power) to
modify parental responsibility (fka custody) or parenting time (fka visitation).
That can be a significant problem which doesn't exist under the Uniform
Interstate Family Support Act, CRS 14-3-101, et. seq.
Registration of foreign decree can only be done in the state in which the
obligor is living. Unless the obligee also resides in the same state,
registration of foreign decree is not wise given the possibility of a custody or
visitation fight in the obligor's home state and problems under the Uniform
Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, CRS 14-13-101 et. seq.
Consult counsel if you are considering representing yourself and foreign decree
registration remedies - a lay person is likely in way over his / her head.
2. REGISTRATION
& ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT
Once
child support has been reduced to judgment (see above), the judgment may be
registered in the foreign jurisdiction and enforced as any other money judgment.
Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act - CRS 13-53-103 When filed, the
judgment has the same effect and is subject to the same procedures, defenses and
proceedings for re-opening, vacating or staying as a Colorado judgment and may
be enforced or satisfied in like manner. An
exemplified, not certified copy, of all documents in the originating court file
must be filed here with the registration. Most states have similar
statutory provisions under full faith and credit provisions of the U.S.
Constitution.
-
Upside to this process:
Rapid enforcement
Judgment for support can be
taken quickly in the home state where the original support order entered
Local private counsel can be
retained in the responding state to proceed with enforcement
The responding court has no
jurisdiction over the issues of parental responsibility allocation (custody) or
parenting time (visitation)
-
Significant downside to this
process:
Loss of contempt remedy
Contempt of court is never an
available remedy for enforcement of a money judgment
This applies to
Colorado or the jurisdiction in which the judgment is registered
Support arrearages may not be
enforced by judgment and contempt of court.
Once the arrearage has been reduced to
judgment, contempt of court remedy is waived. Contempt is no longer an available remedy even if
the obligor moved to state of the original court order or if a
interstate support enforcement action were later commenced.
Garnishment limitations for a money
judgment are significantly less than child support enforcement
Instead of 55% or 65% the money
judgment may be limited to 25% or 35% of disposable income
Garnishment priorities for a money
judgment are less than for a support judgment
This garnishment would rank below:
other support income assignments, garnishments or health benefit assignments
This applies even if the above were subsequently
served after the judgment garnishment
If the obligor's employer is later served
with separate
support income assignments, garnishments or health benefit assignments
this money judgment would be
subordinated behind the support assignment or garnishment
The judgment creditor would likely receive nothing until
the support garnishment or assignment was released
Assets which would be subject to seizure as a support
enforcement may be exempt from garnishment or
levy as a money judgment. e.g.: military pay or retirement pay
As
with foreign decree registration remedies, consult counsel if you are
considering representing yourself regarding registration and enforcement of
support as a foreign judgment. A lay person is again likely in over his /
her head.
|
|
|
| OUTGOING CASE |
|
COLORADO
SUPPORT ORDER
OUT OF STATE OBLIGOR RESIDENCE |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Colorado has enacted the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, CRS 14-3-101,
et. seq. This is a mechanism whereby support can be enforced interstate
and was formerly known as Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support
(URESA). If the
divorce or support order was entered in State A, the obligee now lives in State
B and the obligor now lives in State C, support can still be commenced from the
obligee's home state - State B. Convenient. Also, if paternity has not been
established, DNA testing can be ordered and a paternity order will be entered, but the responding court will
not address custody or visitation. Collect the cash, but no need to consider
visitation - also quite convenient. Remedies of judgment enforcement or contempt of
court are available - very convenient. There is a nominal fee for the
information packet, but otherwise the obligee doesn't incur attorney's fees or
costs - perhaps the most convenient factor of all.
Clients who previously retained my services had generally waited 2 - 3 years for the local governmental
Child
Support Enforcement Unit (CSE) to act, and the local court
had not yet entered orders to forward the case to the responding jurisdiction.
They were frustrated, and private counsel could act with reasonable speed.
In all fairness, at that time the local CSE was under different contract and
management. I suspect the current CSE is also swamped with cases.
Then the feds came on scene with
-
Standardization forms which required
duplication of data in multiple form locations
delay and fees
civil injunction
-
Reporting and statistic requirements:
case be forwarded from the local court
to the Colorado DHS for statistics
then to the responding state DHS
state office for statistics
then to the responding jurisdiction
CSE and court for litigation
add more time delay and tracking
In the
last interstate support enforcement case I initiated from Colorado, the
responding state DHS (Nebraska) declined to accept the incoming case because I was a
private attorney without a FIPS code - a federal CSE ID number. I was told
absent the FIPS code, the local CSE would not receive federal compensation, and
they therefore declined CSE participation in the case. After paying an attorney
in Nebraska to research whether he could file the case, I was
advised only the government CSE could prosecute the incoming support case.
Client received a full refund, and I discontinued outgoing interstate support
enforcement representation.
Private attorneys can generally act quickly, while government offices may not be
highly motivated or are inundated with welfare cases and back burner non-welfare
cases. Parents need support for kids now - in future years. In my opinion,
typical federal FUBAR. Although the motivation may have been good, in
their zeal to standardize, regulate and generate data,
the feds have taken private counsel out of interstate child support enforcement.
|
 |
attorney does not accept outgoing interstate child support enforcement
cases |
. The
El Paso County
Bar Association Lawyer Referral Service Program may be aware of a
private attorney who will initiate an
outgoing interstate child support enforcement cases. Using the
local
CSE may cause delay, but it may be your only alternative. |

|
GOVERNMENT
CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNITS |
Government expends a large sum of money on AFDC (welfare - Aid to Federally
Dependent Children). When welfare is provided to a family, naturally the
government is interested in collecting child support from the obligor parent to
reduce the government expenditure. Under Title IV-D of the social security act,
federal funding is provided to local government to establish child support
enforcement units. You may also hear these referred to as IV-D agencies or
CSE.
Support enforcement was previously provided by the district attorney's office,
however for years local IV-D child support enforcement units have been privatized under contract.
The
primary function of any
CSE
is to collect support arrearages in cases where an
AFDC recipient has assigned his / her rights to receive child support in
exchange for welfare benefits. In other words, the
government is collecting back welfare paid on behalf of children from non-residential parents.
IV-D units
will also enforce support on behalf of non-welfare obligees.
-
Upside:
IV-D child support enforcement units also
collect support for non-welfare persons
There may be a minor fee of $35+ for the
initial packet, however the
CSE
units do not charge attorney's fees
If you are patient: "If it's free,
it's for me."
-
Downside:
Likely a non-welfare case will not be
assigned as high a priority as a welfare case
Patience will likely be required
It may be difficult to speak to the
attorney or paralegal assigned to your case
CSEs
in Colorado have the power to initiate proceedings for suspension of the
obligor's relevant licenses. After administrative hearing by the
CSE
and
issuance of a non-compliance notice, actual suspension is finalized by the
relevant state Department of Revenue, Division of Motor Vehicles or Division of
Wildlife, or state professional regulatory and licensing agency.
| CRS 26-13-123
|
Colorado driver's license or
Colorado driving privileges if obligor is
licensed out of state
Enforcement - refer to my website
Driving
Under Restraint |
| CRS 26-13-126 |
Professional / occupational license |
| CRS 26-13-126 |
Recreational licenses
- hunting, fishing or boating |
CSEs also have lawful power to initiate proceedings for intercept of revenue due
the obligor.
| CRS 26-13-111 |
IRS + Colorado DOR tax refund intercepts |
| CRS 26-13-111.5 |
State vendor
payment intercepts |
| CRS 26-13-118 |
Lottery winnings intercepts |
Private counsel does not
have lawful authority to take the above actions, however can contact
CSE
attorneys requesting
commencement of suspension proceedings. Naturally, a sufficient factual basis
must be provided to
CSE
attorneys.
All
types of license intercept or suspension proceedings can be initiated concurrent (at the same
time) as other enforcement proceedings. Although
CSE
units likely have a heavy
caseload, typically the
CSE
paralegals and attorneys are competent. Bear in mind
- support enforcement is their exclusive practice - it's what they do.
NOTE.
Until a child support order has been entered by a court of competent
jurisdiction, an obligor is potentially liable for the entire amount of
welfare paid on behalf of the child(ren).
CSEs
seek actual welfare paid, not
limited to the presumptive statutory child support guideline computations, and
this may be significantly more than a subsequent child support order. It
typically takes the IV-D Units a period of time to get to any case, but when
they do, the attorneys can be quite aggressive. If the children are receiving
welfare, it is to the obligor’s advantage to obtain a child support order as
quickly as possible to limit the welfare reimbursement liability which will be
sought by the government.
See CRS 14-14-104, CRS 14-10-115, CRS 19-4-116
In re Marriage of Ward, 856 P.2d 67 (Colo. App. 1993), People v. J.J.H.,
7 P.3d 1021 (Colo. App. 2000)
El Paso & Teller Counties -
Local Area CSE Units
Follow link to access location and phone number information


|
DO
I NEED AN ATTORNEY? |
|
Do I need an attorney?
|
If you are reading this web
page, it's probably time to loosen the pocket book and retain counsel. |
|
Usually
private counsel is retained under the following circumstances.
An obligee has unsuccessfully tried the self
help route.
Income assignments, health benefit
assignments, writs of execution, writs of garnishment, subpoena duces
tecum, etc. have become overwhelming.
An obligee has become impatient with a child
support enforcement unit (CSE) and their heavy caseload
Children's
needs are on-going and do not abate (take a time-out) simply because the obligor
parent isn't contributing for whatever reason. Each obligee must weigh the
balance:
Do I wish to incur the expense of attorney's
fees and costs?
Does obligor have resources / income
/ capacity, or is obligor a "turnip?"
Do I wish timely professional attention to
enforcement of support due me?
Be aware, when support
enforcement proceedings are commenced, it is common for the other party
to file a motion to modify support and also parenting time / allocation
of parental responsibility. When one party opens the can of worms,
all the worms come out. |
|
|

At the time of the first
visit, a prospective client will be quoted
hourly attorney fees and estimated costs. |